The three essential resources of land, energy and water are connected by the same crisis of inequality driven by increasing privatization and corporate control. While universal provision remains an eminently practical goal, it requires a shift in global priorities and wide-scale redistribution through a system of international sharing monitored by an effective and representative United Nations.
US subsidies for nuclear power programmes have triggered a race to build the first commercial reactor in the United States in a generation. However, moving away from fossil fuels also requires government intervention. But nuclear power has costs that will never diminish, argues Tyson Slocum.
In the battle for a sustainable water future, a
far-reaching revolt is needed to reclaim citizenship and redefine how we interact with our environment - otherwise, these twenty-first century water wars could be merely a last stand
against an inevitable corporatized future. By
Alan Snitow and Deborah Kaufman.
The privatisation of water means that profits
spring from the fact that the poor population for whom it is harder and
harder to get safe drinking water is growing. We must create a movement to take back control of the
water that is so essential to our lives, says Sakuma Tomoko.
Western
companies are pushing to acquire vast stretches of African land to meet
the world's biofuel needs. Local farmers and governments are being
showered with promises. But is this just another form of economic
colonialism? By Horand Knaup.
South Africa must recognise the role of land
rent in the economy and consider radical economic changes - without leaving land redistribution to the market under the
"willing buyer, willing seller" principle, writes Mark Braund.
The energy crisis and our over-dependency on oil demands a total
restructuring of the global economy toward the self-sufficient and
small scale, and signals the end to the transnational
corporation, writes A.K. Gupta.
The tragedy of the commons - which asserts that human beings are helpless
prisoners of biology and the market - is a
useful political myth, and a scientific-sounding way of saying that there
is no alternative to the dominant world order, writes Ian Angus.