STWR - Share The World's Resources

Search Newsletters Webfeeds
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size

Global Financial Crisis

Latest   Overview   Key Facts   More Info   News Alerts
Latest Articles Only
Independence from the Corporate Global Economy
The Corporate WorldEthan Miller, 7th Jan 07 - Yes! Magazine

The old story says we have to depend on big corporations. The new story tells us we can earn a livelihood, gain freedom, and build community through cooperation.

Call it "globalization," or the "free market," or "capitalism." Whatever its name, people across the United States and throughout the world are experiencing the devastating effects of an economy that places profit above all else.

None of this, of course, is news. Many of us have come to believe that the crucial economic decisions affecting our lives are made not by us, but by far-away "experts" and mysterious "market forces." A friend asked me recently, "Since when did the American people decide to send their manufacturing sector south to exploit people in El Salvador or the Dominican Republic?" We didn't, and nobody ever asked.

But what's the alternative? We're taught that there are only two possible economic choices: capitalism—a system in which rich people and corporations have the power, make the decisions, and control our lives; or communism—a system where state bureaucrats have the power, make the decisions, and control our lives. What a choice!

 
World Economy at Risk From Chaos of Bush Regime

Joseph E. StiglitzJoseph E. Stiglitz 29th Dec 06, Business World

The world survived 2006 without a major economic catastrophe, despite sky-high oil prices and a Middle East spiralling out of control.

But the year produced abundant lessons for the global economy, as well as warning signs concerning its future performance.

Unsurprisingly, it brought another resounding rejection of fundamentalist neo-liberal policies, this time by voters in Nicaragua and Ecuador. In neighbouring Venezuela, Hugo Chavez had an overwhelming electoral victory: at least he had brought some education and health care to the poor barrios, which previously had received little of the benefits of the country's enormous oil wealth.

Perhaps most importantly for the world, voters in the US gave a vote of no-confidence to President George Bush, who will now be held in check by a Democratic congress. 

When Bush assumed the presidency in 2001, many hoped he would govern competently from the centre. More pessimistic critics consoled themselves by questioning how much harm a president could do in a few years. We now know the answer: a great deal.

 
2007: a storm is brewing
Global Economy Larry Elliot, 27th Dec 06, The Guardian
 
As 2006 draws to a close and I gaze into my crystal ball, I can see three possible financial forecasts for the year ahead.
 
Some years ago, I quizzed a City economist I knew well about his method for forecasting Britain's monthly trade deficit. All the big firms put out predictions for the size of the deficit (it is always a deficit these days) and I was interested to find out how the experts did it. "Quite simple", said my friend, "what I do is add up the deficits of the past three months, divide by three and there's my forecast."
 
The moral of this story is that you should take forecasts from so-called experts with a pinch of salt. You can be a highly paid City hot shot and still get it spectacularly wrong. That preamble over, it's time for me to gaze into my crystal ball and predict what is in store for 2007.
 
Why the Buck Is on the Edge
US Dollars Let's face it. Foreign exchange markets are not mass entertainment. They're not the NFL, MTV or MySpace. So you might have missed the latest excitement of the sliding dollar. Who cares if the euro is now worth $1.33 instead of the $1.28 it was on Nov. 20 -- a 4 percent loss for the dollar? Well, we all should. The dollar's mysterious movements pose one of the thorniest economic questions of our time: Can the world economy thrive without the massive stimulus of ever-increasing U.S. trade deficits?

It's no secret that Asia, Europe and Latin America have feasted on the U.S. trade gap. In 2006 the deficit will reach about $800 billion -- bringing the cumulative total since 1996 to $4.4 trillion. But as the U.S. economy slows, so will Americans' ravenous appetite for imports. Likewise, the dropping dollar (down 11 percent against the euro this year) will make U.S. exports more competitive on global markets. Big exporting countries may suffer. They need stronger domestic economic growth -- or their economies may languish.

 
Plunging dollar will set world markets reeling
The slowdown in the US economy, which has sent the dollar into freefall over the past fortnight, will have devastating knock-on effects in markets around the world, analysts warn.

As the US slows, and consumers in the world's biggest economy feel the buying power of the dollar in their pocket declining, global growth will be hit hard, economists say. The greenback took yet another turn for the worse on Friday, after a survey of the US manufacturing sector showed output declining for the first time in more than three years.

Wall Street is now betting that Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke will slash interest rates to stave off a recession. The dollar ended the week at $1.98 against the pound, and $1.32 to the euro, but analysts say there is further weakness to come. 'I think the dollar's going to hell in a handbag,' said David Bloom, currency strategist at HSBC. 'The market is starting to think that the US is going from a soft landing to a hard landing.'

Some analysts have argued that a more balanced global economy, with strong growth in Asia and Europe, means the impact of a US slowdown will be limited; but Stephen Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley, believes China - and in turn the rest of Asia - will follow.

'America is China's largest export market, accounting for 21 per cent of its total exports over the past five years,' he said, adding that economies such as Japan, Korea and Taiwan, which export directly to the US but also sell components to China that are assembled before being sent on to the US, will be hit.

Eurozone finance ministers have expressed alarm at the strength of the euro against the dollar, fearing that their exporters will suffer; but the European Central Bank is expected to push up interest rates by another quarter-point on Thursday, as it frets about inflation.

Despite increasing signs of weakening demand in the world's biggest economy, ECB chairman Jean-Claude Trichet has insisted the 12-member single currency zone can shrug off a US slowdown.

'The ECB's in a complete state of denial,' said Paul Mortimer-Lee, global head of market economics at BNP Paribas. 'Quite a lot depends on how Trichet plays it at the ECB press conference next week. They're hankering after raising rates again next year.'

Wall Street will also be watching Bernanke for signals of a change. The Fed has left rates on hold at 5.25 per cent since the summer, after increasing them 17 times over the previous two years as the US economy recovered from the post-dotcom downturn. Bernanke sought to reassure the currency markets last week by stressing that the Fed is still concerned about inflation, but his words failed to stem the sell-off. 'It's as though the markets are saying, "you central bankers are worrying about inflation, we're worrying about the reality of life",' said Bloom.

Mortimer-Lee said the Fed would wait for definitive evidence before making a move. 'At the end of the tightening cycle, you know you've got an inflation problem, and it's only when the evidence is overwhelming that you move.' However, he believes that evidence will come soon: with investment in construction already falling as the housing boom turns to bust, BNP Paribas is predicting that a million jobs will be lost in the building industry alone over the coming 18 months.

Equity markets are already wobbling as investors weigh the cost of a US slowdown. Graham Turner of GFC Economics said a shake-out would raise questions about this year's merger frenzy.

'We have had an absolute monster year in terms of leveraged transactions,' he said. 'A lot of them looked quite dubious in terms of their economic value. Once the market starts to retreat, all the suspect things that went on come out of the woodwork.'

Heather Stewart

Published on 3rd December 2006, by The Observer 

 
Another day, another fall in the dollar
The White House wants a strong greenback but the US deficit is weighing heavily

The dollar came under pressure for the fifth day in row yesterday as further evidence of weakness in the world's largest economy emerged and as a key international body warned that the US economy was running out of steam.

Henry "Hank" Paulson, the US treasury secretary, reiterated on a visit to London that the Bush administration remained wedded to a "strong dollar" but this failed to stem the tide as dealers bet that the long-expected slump in the greenback's value had finally arrived.

Having recovered some lost ground late on Monday, the dollar set a fresh two-year low of just above $1.95 against the pound in hectic trading yesterday. There is widespread speculation that it could soon breach the $2 level - something it has not done for 14 years. It also slid to a 20-month low against the euro of $1.318. The US currency has now shed 11% of its value against the euro this year and 12% against the pound.

In reality, though, the dollar has been falling steadily for four years. On a trade-weighted basis against a basket of other currencies, it has lost nearly 31% of its value as fears over its giant current account deficit drag on the currency.

A big deficit, caused by Americans consuming more goods from abroad than they export, theoretically pushes a currency down until imports become more expensive and exports cheaper, at which point the deficit is reduced. But the dollar has held up because big exporters to the US, such as China, have used their current account surpluses to reinvest in American assets, thus keeping demand for dollars high.

Indeed, the dollar surprised everyone in 2005 by regaining some of the losses of the previous three years and so is still not back to the lows it visited at the end of 2004, in spite of the recent falls.

A weaker dollar means a shopping bonanza for Britons. Airlines and travel firms have seen a surge in bookings as people rush to take advantage of cheap US goods that just got cheaper. The flipside, though, is for British companies such as Jaguar to get hit hard in the American market if prices in dollars rise.

About 10% of British trade is with the United States, so exporters will suffer from the stronger dollar but importers of US goods will see costs fall. Petrol prices at the pump could fall as the world's oil and oil products are priced in dollars.

Mr Paulson, former head of the US investment bank Goldman Sachs, repeated the usual mantra of US treasury secretaries that he favoured a strong dollar. "A strong dollar is clearly in our nation's interest and I feel very good today about the strength of the US economy," he said after addressing the CBI conference in London.

He was upbeat about the US economy in spite of the slowdown in growth and, in particular, the housing market. "We have a healthy economy that is making a successful transition from a rate of growth that earlier in the year was not sustainable to one that is sustainable."

Mr Paulson said again that the US sought greater flexibility from China. The US has long wanted Beijing to let its currency rise against the dollar to remove the artificial advantage that the pegged yuan gives Chinese exporters.

But data out shortly after he spoke showed that the weakness in the dollar might be more home-grown. Orders for durable goods fell unexpectedly sharply, by 8.3% in October from September, driven by big falls in civilian aircraft, computer and electronics orders.

James Knightley, of ING Financial Markets, said: "This perhaps suggests that the US economic slowdown is spreading to the corporate sector." He said the Federal Reserve, which raised rates from 1% in 2004 to 5.25% this year, may cut them again as soon as March.

But Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve chairman, said in a speech last night that there were still inflationary forces in the US economy and hinted that the Fed may need to raise rates. That dampened hopes for an early rate cut, although Mr Bernanke noted that the weak housing market posed a downside risk to growth.

Data released yesterday showed sales of existing homes rose in October for the first time since February, to an annual rate of 6.24m homes. But the figures also showed that house prices dropped 3.5% on a year earlier - the third straight month of decline and the worst year-on-year fall since records began in 1968.

To compound American woes, the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development said in its latest outlook that the US economy was slowing and would only grow by 2.4% next year after a downwardly revised prediction of 3.3% for this year.

It blamed the housing market slowdown for the lacklustre US performance but said the rest of the world would march on. Jean-Philippe Cotis, the OECD's chief economist, said: "Rather than a major slowdown, what the world may be facing is a rebalancing of growth across OECD regions."


Ashley Seager

Published 9th November 2006, by The Guardian 

 
Economic Empire Building: The Centrality of Corruption

Economic empire building (EEB) is the driving force of the US economy and became more central over the past five years. More than ever before in US economic history, the principal US banks, oil companies, manufacturers, investment houses, pension and mutual funds all depend on exploiting overseas nations and peoples to secure high rates of profit. Increasingly the majority of banking and corporate profits accrue from overseas plunder.

 
Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 Next > End
Results 121 - 132 of 162