| Globalization of the American Crisis |
|
|
|
If the US economy crumbles, it will drag most countries with it - and the world still awaits the fatal sting of the crisis 4th April 08 - Michel Morkos, Dar Al Hayat Since 1971, the world has witnessed 24 economic crises, at a rate of a crisis every one and a half year. They were all different in intensity and impact on global economy. Some were limited to their country of origin, others expanded within a multinational economic sector, such as banks or IT. A third category had more comprehensive global dimensions. Banks and financial services markets registered the highest number of crises between 1971 and 2008, in addition to crises related to them.
Financial crises dwarfed all other crises, as happened in some Asian
countries, in Brazil and Russia in 1998, then in Turkey and Argentina
in 2001, followed by Brazil in 2002. The subprime mortgage crisis and
the losses incurred by the world stock markets between 2007 and 2008
portend the worst global economic crisis in eight decades. So far, the
world seems unable to contain its effects and repercussions. Its
ripples are reaching other countries and overtaking the US
Administration's $154-billion economic stimulus plan and the Fed's
decision to lower short-term benchmark interest rate and pump liquidity
into banks, thus providing them with a money supply needed to satisfy
demand and face financial tightness in the US, the EU and Japan.
The
US is a major economic pole in the world. As it lies at the heart of
this multi-facet and multi-interest economic system, it will drag with
it most countries if it crumbles. Americans spend around $10 trillion a
year on their own consumption, a fact that is enough to make the world
realize the Superpower's need for a multi-national "factory" and for
the production of mining and agriculture's many sources of raw
material. China and India combined do not consume more than $2 trillion
a year. They are even unable to compensate for the shrinking purchasing
power of the Americans by an increase in domestic consumption. No
matter how much money the US Administration will spend to increase the
purchasing power of the US households, the latter has lost a strong
financial support with the collapse of the real estate sector, economic
recession and widespread unemployment. "The rise of oil prices above
$100 per barrel is putting pressure on consumers, while unemployment
rates are still on the rise. With the collapse of the real estate
market, empty-pocketed Americans are no longer capable of using their
houses as a source to fund their shopping obsession. The US economy is
no longer facing a passing crisis; it is now in the preliminary stages
of a long and painful period." (Foreign Policy)
The US is an
important trading partner of most advanced, oil-producing or emerging
countries. It imports 26% of the world's overall imported oil; it
attracts around 41% of Asian exports, including Turkey and the Middle
East, and around 19% of the EU's exports. 24% of Bangladesh's exports,
23% of Japan's, 22% of China's, 21% of India's and Vietnam's, 20% of
Malaysia's and Cambodia's, 16% of Philippines', Hong Kong's and
Thailand's, and around 15% of South Korea's reach the US markets.
Almost every country in the world has an important trade relation with
this superpower. The depreciating dollar is causing these countries to
panic more and more. A bad indicator per se, the falling dollar makes
their goods and products expensive against a reverse trade movement for
the US goods and products.
According to economists, lowering
interest rates now will not entail a magical economic recovery, as was
the case in 2001 when the Federal Reserve lowered the interest rates
from 6.5 to 1; the European Central Bank lowered them from 4 to 2,
while the Bank of Japan slashed them to zero. Central Banks currently
have a tight margin of maneuver amid the spiraling inflation rates. Any
drop in the interest rate - coupled with a depreciating dollar - could
ruin foreign investment and reduce US debts funding.
The US runs up
a debt of more than $9 trillion, at a rate that grows 4 times faster
than the production rate. In other words, for every indebted dollar,
the US does not make more than 25 new cents of real wealth.
Against
the obstacles to activate the country's economy, the US Administration
is striving to put the Federal Reserve in a position that enables it to
be the key body in charge of organizing market stability. The plan will
expand the Fed's capabilities to monitor commercial banks and financial
services institution, with an emphasis on the current commercial banks
system. Under this new plan, the Federal Reserve will become the only
governmental tool that keeps the market in check, maintains its
stability and stays updated about its situation.
In parallel to such
measures that reassure world markets, the developing countries - in
fear of negative repercussions - aim at easing inflationary pressures.
China, expecting this year a one-point decrease compared with its
record growth rate of 10.7%, knows quite well that this decrease is due
to the shrinking exports to the US. China knows quite well that it must
control inflation rates to maintain a domestic consumption power that
offsets the external losses and maintains a reasonable production cost
competitive in destination markets. However, markets that are less
linked to the trade exchange with the US are less likely to be shaken.
Russia, which revalued its growth rate for this year, improved its
expectations in spite of the inflation creeping into its markets.
In
the approach between the US measures and the global economic situation
lies a truth: The purchasing power in developing countries, as well as
in oil-producing and oil-exporting countries, increased much compared
with a decade ago. These countries are indeed capable of compensating a
part of the fall in their exports of goods and services to the US. Yet,
the problem remains among the non-oil producing countries - even if
they were advanced. They all await the fatal sting of the crisis!
|