In 2009, countries have reached perilous new levels of conflict, tension and military spending characterised by nuclear proliferation, ideological warfare and pre-emptive invasions of sovereign nations. As news reports highlight an intensifying competition over natural resources, the international community is faced with a stark choice - to share resources and cooperate, or to continue on the path to further warfare.
The "war on terror" and the "long war" are
losing their potency as shorthand guides to the global conflict. But
the United States remains trapped by a military logic that guarantees
an endless and unwinnable campaign, says Paul Rogers.
Although the term military-industrial complex
is well-known, a discussion of its origins, implications, and Eisenhower's warning against its "unwarranted influence"
has largely been ignored, says Chalmers Johnson.
A report by the Commonwealth Institute lays out a comprehensive plan
for withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq, focusing on the need for
reconciliation, regional dialogue, humanitarian aid, and a central peacekeeping role
for the United Nations.
The United States can lead the world in combating the greatest threats
facing the planet, writes David Korten - and the only way to do it is
through renouncing war as an instrument of national policy.
The principle of nonintervention is not an ideal, but rather
commonsense, writes Robert Scheer, although cutting the U.S. military
budget faces great obstacles from powerful vested interests.
Five years on from Iraq's "endless war", plans for a permanent US presence in the Middle East have been defied - along with Washington's vision for the new American century.
Among the many reasons given for the recent surge in gas prices is China's soaring demand for petroleum. Because the Chinese are running around the world buying up every available barrel of oil, the argument goes, we Americans have to pay that much more to outbid them for the leftover pools of crude.