The escalating crisis of soaring food prices and food insecurity is the result of a development model based on large-scale, export-orientated agriculture tied to international competition, self interest and stock market speculation. With at least 923 million people going hungry each day despite a huge surplus of food production, a reorientation towards local self-sufficiency founded upon the concept of ‘food sovereignty’ is urgently required.
The emergency food summit in Rome drew up the battle lines over the
future of global agriculture - and the stakes could scarcely be higher,
writes Sam Urquhart.
Biofuels have forced global food prices up by 75% - far more than
previously estimated - according to a confidential World Bank report
obtained by the Guardian.
Free-trade policies long advanced by
World Bank President Robert Zoellick and U.S. President George W.
Bush are losing favor as countries in Africa, Asia and Latin
America find they can't buy enough food to feed their people.
The food crisis has decisive implications for the future role of
international financial institutions - and is calling into question the
basis of their approach to development, argues the Bretton Woods
Project.
The World Bank's response to the food crisis is a 'fire-extinguisher' approach that fails to address its root
causes, argues Eurodad - namely the unregulated process of trade
liberalisation, structural adjustment and stringent conditionality
implemented by the World Bank and the IMF in the first place.
The Rome summit of the Food & Agriculture Organisation failed to
address the roots of the current price and hunger crises. These lie in
incoherent and unfair global food policies, says Sue Branford.